After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures around Europe, new technologies are actually reviving these types of systems. From lie recognition tools analyzed at the boundary to a system for validating documents and transcribes selection interviews, a wide range of technologies is being applied to asylum applications. This article is exploring just how these solutions have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers are transformed into compelled hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unforeseen tiny within criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs the capacity to work these systems and to follow their legal right for cover.
It also demonstrates how these kinds of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They facilitate the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of distributed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity simply by hindering all of them from being able to view the stations of protection. It further argues that examines of securitization and victimization should be along with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of them technologies, through which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who have are regimented by their dependence on technology.
Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article argues that these solutions have an natural obstructiveness. They have a double impact: www.ascella-llc.com whilst they assistance to expedite the asylum method, they also generate it difficult with respect to refugees to navigate these kinds of systems. They are positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to illegitimate decisions manufactured by non-governmental actors, and ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, that they pose fresh risks of’machine mistakes’ that may result in incorrect or discriminatory outcomes.